The N-Town play of The Woman Taken in Adultery follows the account in the Gospel of John very closely, and with only one notable embellishment ?
the scene wherein the adulterous woman is abducted from the brothel, including the young man present in that scene.
I believe that the gospel was followed more closely here than in other plays because, in addition to John?
s general air of accuracy, there was little that could be added to make his portrayal of the event more evocative, or if you?
re a Pharisee, provocative, except for the brothel scene.
Both John and the N-Town playwright have Jesus talking to his followers and writing in the dust as the accusers approach and make their case.
Analysis Of The Story Of The Adulterous Woman Essay, Research Paper Stoned Obituary: An Analysis of The Story of the Adulterous Woman Look which of you that never sin wrought, But is of life cleaner than she, Cast at her stones and spare her not, Clean out of sin if that ye be. Unlike the Synoptic writers, John avoids descriptions of the origins and early childhood of Jesus, which none of the gospel writers would have known much about, except through less accurate tales than the ones upon which the rest of the writings are based.
(N-Town: Woman Taken In Adultery: Medieval Drama; Bevington, David; Houghton Mifflin, 1975) Who among us has never sinned? have been found as far as Syria, which improves the likelihood of John? This would place the original writing of the gospel at no later than 100 A. John also includes a significant amount of material not found in the Synoptics.And, in our place as fellow victims of our own all too human nature, have we any right to pass judgement on those who do the same as we do, if with less discretion? s version1 of Jesus and, later, the playwright of the N-Town Cycle, following in his footsteps, believed that the appearance of a moral life is worthless without the genuine article to buttress it. In addition to the Adulterous Woman, all the other material in John 2-4, which covers Jesus’ early Galilean ministry, is not found in the Synoptics.If so, this begs the question of whether morality lies in following the social mores or if it is all in hiding from the public eye how often you don? It sounds like a solid principle, and one that could be applied, even today, but despite the similarities in the texts, did the mediaeval context provide less charitable messages along with the story? And, for that matter, is there more than first appears to that original moral? Prior visits of Jesus to Jerusalem before the Passion Week are mentioned only in John.Among the gospels, only John makes mention of the Adulterous Woman, which brings to question the probability of the actual occurrence. Nor do Matthew, Mark or Luke mention the resurrection of Lazarus found in John 11.However, the differences between John and the Synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) have led many scholars to believe that John may have been written to supplement the material found in the other three gospels. John presents his material in the form of extended dialogues or discourses rather than the pithy sayings found often in the Synoptics; this holds a certain appeal to the scholarly mind, which seeks accuracy rather than epigrams.It is believed that the Gospel of John was written later than the Synoptic gospels, but the debate still stands as to how much later; estimates range from 75 A. This air of accuracy may be what originally persuaded the N-Town playwright to keep his text so true to the gospel account.